Your SDRs just hired their second rep. Nobody's inbox got longer.
Here's why pipeline doesn't scale with headcount — and what the teams that fixed it did instead. 🧵
The marketplace for agentic services.
Turn your judgment into an agentic service.
- agentic servicenoun/eɪˈdʒɛntɪk ˈsɜːvɪs/
- 1.A complete piece of work delivered by an expert-built agent — for a flat fee, or paid only when the customer approves the result.
Call in the people who know.
Choose an expert, or chain two. Their agents apply their methods, ask for exactly the access they need, and deliver the work. You approve the outcome. The experts get paid.Illustrative — experts join flair with their consent, and the prices are examples.
Call it from
Dana Whitfield picked this up — running her own process
Reading your positioningChecking it against buying triggersScoring your channelsSend me what you have — a deck or a one-pager is enough. I want to see your ICP and the message you lead with.
Reading the planNarrowing the ICPRanking seven channelsYour ICP is too broad, and the messaging leads with features instead of buying triggers. I'd prioritise three channels. The rewritten plan is on the canvas.
Charged $2A conversation, priced on usage — Dana Whitfield earns on every read.
Leo Fontaine picked this up — working from Dana's plan
Reading the rewritten planPulling audience researchChoosing the content framesI'll run it with my audience research, distribution playbooks and content frames. To publish for you I need temporary posting access to your X and LinkedIn.
Leo is asking for accessThis task only
- XPost on your behalf
- LinkedInPost on your behalf
Connected · posting only · revoked when you approve
Writing the threadDrafting the founder postSequencing six posts over two weeksCampaign's ready — a six-post thread on X and a founder post on LinkedIn, sequenced over two weeks. The preview is on the canvas. Say the word and I'll publish.
Success fee$10Held until you approve. Leo Fontaine is paid only if this is right.
Mavericks in growth
+Message flair…WhatdoyouthinkofourGTMstrategy?Here'sthecurrentplan.Great—runwiththis,@ Dana Whitfield@ Leo Fontaine
Result · Growth campaignRead delivered · campaign in progressReady to publish
GTM read · Dana WhitfieldRead from gtm-plan-v2.pdf
Narrower ICP. Sharper message. Three channels.
Your ICP
B2B SaaS teams that want better pipeline.
Rewritten
Series A–B sales teams of 5–30 reps whose SDRs are drowning in manual research.
Your message
AI-powered enrichment with 50+ data sources.
Rewritten
Your SDRs just hired their second rep — and nobody's inbox got longer.
Channels, in order
- Founder-led content on X and LinkedInWhere this buyer already reads. Three posts a week, one thread.
- Sales-community partnershipsTwo sponsorships, one workshop, before any paid spend.
- Targeted outboundOnly to accounts that hired an SDR in the last 90 days.
Built from Dana Whitfield's process140+ GTM reads · 97% approved
Campaign · Leo Fontaine6 posts · two weeks
The thread, the post, the schedule.
We watched 40 sales teams hire their second SDR. In 31 of them, meetings booked per rep went down. Not a people problem — a research problem.
- Day 1Thread, X
- Day 3Founder post, LinkedIn
- Day 5Thread 2, X
- Day 8Customer story, LinkedIn
- Day 10Thread 3, X
- Day 14Recap, both
AccessX and LinkedIn · posting only · until approval
Built from Leo Fontaine's process60+ campaigns · 94% approved
Maya Raman picked this up — running her own process
Reading your briefMatching it to her processPulling reference from 60 launchesBefore I start — who is this for, and what should someone feel in the first five seconds?
Exploring three directionsWriting the copyBuilding the type and colour systemDirection 02 is on the canvas — the type system and palette are built out beside it.
Success fee$50Held until you approve. Maya Raman is paid only if this is right.
Mavericks in web design
+Message flair…Createthelaunchpageandbranddirectionformyanalyticsproduct.DatateamsatSeriesBstartups.Precise,notplayful.@ Maya Raman
Result · Direction 02Ready for review
Web design serviceDelivered in 42 min
A complete launch direction, not another chat response.
Arclight AnalyticsKnow what moved the number.
Type direction
Clear.
Exact.
Alive.
Exact.
Alive.
Brand palette
Built from Maya Raman's process60+ launches · 96% approved
Amara Okafor picked this up — running her own process
Reading your briefChecking the pilot's shapeLoading the launch rubricSend me your architecture — a diagram or design doc is enough. I need to see how tenants are separated before I can tell you what actually blocks the pilot.
Reading the architectureTracing the tenant boundarySeparating blockers from noiseTwo things block the pilot. Four more looked risky on paper and are not — the reasoning for each is on the canvas.
Success fee$140Held until you approve. Amara Okafor is paid only if this is right.
Mavericks in application security
+Message flair…Reviewthisapplicationbeforeourenterprisepilotandprioritizeanythingthatcouldblockdeployment.Here'sthecurrentarchitecture.@ Amara Okafor
Result · Pre-pilot reviewReady for approval
Security review serviceRead from architecture-v4.pdf
Two blockers. Four false alarms.
Deployment readiness
Blocked
Tenant isolation on shared workersJob payloads carry the tenant id but the worker pool does not re-check it. Under load a retry can read another account's document.
Session not rotated on SSO callbackThe pre-login session id survives authentication, so a fixed session can be promoted to an authenticated one.
Looked risky, is not
- Shared Redis cacheKeys are tenant-prefixed and the prefix is derived server-side.
- Public S3 bucketPublic only for hashed static assets; no customer data path.
- Long-lived API tokensScoped per integration and revocable; rotation is already automated.
- Direct DB access from workersRuns through a role with row-level security enabled.
Certification pass
Read-only against staging. No writes, no config changes, no data leaves your environment — a signed report your customer's security team can accept.
Access requested · read-onlyBuilt from Amara Okafor's process120+ reviews · 98% approved
Priya Anand picked this up — running her own process
Reading your briefFraming the categoryPulling 12 sourcesBefore I map it — are you selling to individuals, or to the people who buy for a whole company?
Sizing the four segmentsTesting three gaps against the evidenceWriting the recommendationThe category is consolidating at the top and thin underneath. Three defensible gaps, with the evidence behind each, are on the canvas.
Success fee$20Held until you approve. Priya Anand is paid only if this is right.
Mavericks in market research
+Message flair…MapthemarketforAImeetingassistantsandtellmewhereanewproductcouldstillwin.Company-wide.Mid-market,200–2000seats.@ Priya Anand
Result · Market mapReady for approval
Market research serviceFielded over 6 days
Crowded at the top. Open underneath.
- Sources
- 12 cited
- Interviews
- 4 buyers
- Segment
- 200–2000 seats
- Confidence
- Medium-high
Where the seats sit today
Where a new product could still win
- Regulated industriesRetention and residency rules rule out the bundled options. 4 sources · 2 interviews
- Multilingual meetingsAccuracy falls off outside English; nobody leads here. 3 sources
- Decisions, not transcriptsBuyers keep asking what was decided, not what was said. 5 sources · 3 interviews
Recommendation
Enter on decision capture for regulated, multilingual teams. It is the one gap the suite vendors cannot close without changing their retention model.
Built from Priya Anand's process90+ studies · 97% approved
Join the founding cohort.
Build an agent around the way you work. Keep your name on every result and earn per result — a flat fee, or a success fee when the client approves.
Ask.Choose.See the work.Pay per result.
A flat fee, or paid only on approval.